Interos review: supply chain risk mapping platform

·

Supply chain

Best for

Defense and enterprise procurement teams mapping multi-tier supply chains, the kind of buyer already on the roster: the Department of Defense, NASA, the Navy and the Missile Defense Agency.

Not for

Buyers who need compliance-led supplier vetting or environmental risk scoring alone. Avetta, Assent and Sphera specialize there, without the ramp time Interos requires first.

What it costs

No public price list. The clearest numbers are federal: a Defense Logistics Agency task order worth $3.95 million a year, and $12.2 million in lifetime prime awards.

Fit for enterprise with procurement8511 billion mapped supplier relationships, with visibility two or three tiers past a direct vendor where most large buyers can't see.
Feature breadth versus depth70Six risk domains over a 250-million-company map; the named rivals compete on sector fit or on the workflow around it.
Learning curve35Reviews report that users need training to interpret the output.
Time to first useful output30Onboarding starts with data-integration work.
Price transparency15A personalized quote tied to supplier count, with no published rate card.

What it does

i-Score domains
Cyber, financial, ESG, compliance, geopolitical and operational risk
Claimed coverage
98% of supply chain risk, Interos' own figure
Company map
More than 250 million companies
Relationship map
11 billion supplier relationships
Sub-tier depth
Two or three tiers past a direct vendor, where only 10% of Fortune 1000 firms can see
Monitoring cadence
Continuous real-time monitoring and alerts
Risk reports
Pulled from the platform, running on the same risk model the i-Score uses
Sanctions screening
Supplier names matched against sanctions lists
Labor and ESG flags
Unethical labor practices, emissions and regulatory fine exposure
Geopolitical flags
Location restrictions tied to named vendors
Alternative sourcing
Surfaces substitute suppliers when a disruption hits
Vulnerability detection
Flags physical, financial and cybersecurity vulnerabilities before they cause operational effects, per Interos' own description

Contracts observed

Defense contract
$3,949,600 obligated by the Defense Logistics Agency for year one of a software subscription task order, bought through reseller ThunderCat Technology
Contract ceiling
$11,848,800 for base and all options to 13 August 2028, roughly $3.95m a year
Federal prime awards
$12,224,789.99 across 128 transactions lifetime, which excludes reseller-bought deals like the DLA one
GSA SCRIPTS
$919 million ten-year ordering ceiling to March 2035, shared across multiple awardees and a distributor, not revenue and not a price

The company

Public-sector users
US Department of Defense, NASA, US Navy, Missile Defense Agency
Vendor headcount
Around 146 people
Review sources
G2, Software Advice and SoftwareReviews listings
Revenue estimate
Third-party estimates near $39.7 million ARR; Interos publishes no official figure
Funding and valuation
Roughly $224 million raised, $1 billion valuation in 2024

Buying it

Onboarding load
Data-integration work first, then training before a team can read the output
Rate card
None. Pricing is available on request only
Pricing model
Personalized, tied to supplier count and integration needs
Cost spread
Differs between a mid-market procurement team and a defense contractor mapping a whole chain

Alternatives to Interos

Everstream Analytics

ICPAutomotive and chemicalsClimate and commodity risk RevCmpRnkRpt
Fit
PROPredictive, 4 sectors|CONNot relationship depth
80
Price
CONNo rate card; every page routes to Request Demo
30
Rating
PROGartner 4.2, 25 ratings|CONOne G2 review, 3.5
60

Not forA defense or federal buyer who needs national-security compliance coverage.

Resilinc

ICPAerospace and healthcareMulti-tier mapping stubRevCmpRnkRpt
Fit
PROMulti-tier mapping|CONSector fit, not depth
74
Price
CONNo public rate card, quote only
30
Rating
PROGartner 4.2, 12 ratings|CONZero G2 reviews
55

Not forA team that needs sanctions and ownership screening across a supplier base.

Prewave

ICPProcurement suite buyersSupplier risk monitoring stubRevCmpRnkRpt
Fit
PROShips inside Jaggaer|CONNo relationship graph
66
Price
CONPricing page 404s; quote only
30
Rating
PROGartner 4.6, 15 ratings|CONOne G2 review, 3.5
58

Not forA buyer who wants a standalone risk platform.

Which Interos numbers are the company's own, and which come from third parties

The 98% risk-visibility figure, the 250 million companies and the 11 billion relationships are Interos' published claims, taken from its marketing copy and its G2 listing. The $39.7 million ARR stays a third-party estimate; the company doesn't publish revenue.

The prices on the cost side are published public contracts: what the Defense Logistics Agency obligated on one task order, bought through reseller ThunderCat Technology so the figure carries reseller margin, plus Interos Inc's own lifetime prime-award total. The $919 million SCRIPTS figure comes from Interos' own announcement and is a shared ten-year ordering ceiling, a spending cap separate from revenue and from any per-unit rate.

This review covers what the operational resilience company does, how its i-Score works, and who it's built for. Interos is an AI powered SaaS platform that maps and monitors digital supply chains at scale, backed by investors NightDragon, Venrock and Kleiner Perkins.

↑ FACT SHEETWhat is Interos: an AI powered SaaS platform for digital supply chains

Interos markets itself as a breakthrough Operational Resilience Cloud built to give companies an instant global view of the business relationships buried deep inside complex businesses. On its own G2 listing, Interos describes itself as the world's first, and only, automated supplier threat mitigation platform, built to protect organizations from regulatory fines, unethical labor practices and cyber-attacks.

The platform builds a living global map of supplier networks, tracking business relationships down to a single supplier several tiers removed from a company's direct vendors. Most companies manage supplier risk one relationship at a time, and that approach doesn't hold up for complex businesses spanning multiple continents and industries.

Jennifer Bisceglie founded the operational resilience company and now serves as Founder and Executive Vice Chair. Ted Krantz was appointed CEO in 2024, arriving as the business crossed a $1 billion valuation. Interos is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, and has raised roughly $224 million to date across a backer list that also includes Accenture and Broadway Angels.

Interos at a glance: $224 million raised to date, $1 billion valuation in 2024, around 146 employees, Ted Krantz appointed CEO in 2024, $39.7 million ARR by third-party estimate, and six risk domains in the i-Score

How the i-Score works: an instant global view of every relationship scenario

The i-Score assesses supply chains against multiple risk factors across six domains, including cyber and ESG. Interos says the score gives organizations an instant view into 98% of supply chain risk, built from a database that maps more than 250 million companies and 11 billion supplier relationships.

The numbers behind the i-Score: 250 million companies mapped, 11 billion supplier relationships, 98 percent claimed risk visibility, only 10 percent of Fortune 1000 companies see sub-tier risk, $2.5 trillion estimated annual disruption cost, and 20 percent of data centres at summer risk
10%
Fortune 1000 sub-tier visibility

Only 10% of Fortune 1000 companies can see risk at the sub tier supplier level, where labor, cybersecurity and geopolitical problems tend to start and where a single supplier's financial distress can ripple through an industry. That scale is what the 250-million-company map is built to cover.

From Interos' marketing copy

"We detect physical, financial, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities well before operational effects, with an instant global view of every relationship scenario you can imagine."

That relationship scenario framing is the difference from a traditional vendor questionnaire, which captures a supplier's own account of itself at a single moment.

↑ FACT SHEETInteros features

Six risk domains and detection

Interos uses artificial intelligence to detect vulnerabilities across cyber, financial, ESG, compliance, geopolitical and operational risk. The platform flags unethical labor practices, sanctions exposure and location restrictions tied to specific vendors, giving procurement teams confidence in supplier decisions.

The six risk domains in the i-Score: cyber covering breach history and exposed infrastructure, financial covering distress signals and solvency, ESG covering unethical labour practices and emissions, compliance covering sanctions exposure and regulatory fines, geopolitical covering location restrictions, and operational covering delivery, capacity and concentration

Teams pull risk reports straight out of the platform, helping them judge if a vendor relationship is worth the risk before a contract is signed. Those reports run against the same risk model the i-Score uses, so a flag in a report and a movement in the score trace to the same underlying data.

Multi-tier mapping across supply chain ecosystems

The platform maps multi-tier supply chain relationships to uncover dependencies a company wouldn't otherwise know exist. Interos supports identifying alternative suppliers when a disruption hits, shifting risk management from reacting to a once-a-year audit toward acting on continuous, real-time monitoring and alerts, so a single flagged supplier doesn't turn into a wider disruption across the supply chain.

Mapping supply chain ecosystems at that depth is what artificial intelligence contributes here: the living global map updates as relationships change, and the ability to see two or three tiers past a direct vendor is what most procurement operations lack today.

Who Interos is built for

Interos is built for large enterprises developing global, multi-tier supply chain ecosystems, including defense and government customers. Interos serves the U.S. Department of Defense, NASA, the U.S. Navy and the Missile Defense Agency, and it has been selected government-wide for national security and defense.

Inc. Magazine named Interos one of America's fastest-growing private companies, and it markets its breakthrough Operational Resilience Cloud to a host of Fortune 500 and government customers alike. Headcount sits near 146 people, small against the size of the customers it serves.

Procurement teams use Interos to assess new suppliers, matching names against sanctions lists so the job doesn't rely on one analyst's memory. A supplier's risk profile can change fast, and annual audits can't keep pace with a labor dispute or news that shifts exposure overnight. A lack of visibility into lower-tier suppliers has left companies unaware of what was going wrong until a disruption already happened.

Interos gives teams real-time visibility into a supplier's environment ahead of a crisis, replacing the once-a-year audit checklist with continuous monitoring.

Interos competitors and alternatives

Interos sits in a crowded field, and the named alternatives solve overlapping but distinct problems. Everstream Analytics leads on predictive risk analytics for automotive, chemicals, energy and food. Resilinc competes most directly on multi-tier mapping and resiliency scoring, with strength in aerospace and healthcare. Prewave monitors supplier risk and turns up as a named partner inside other procurement platforms, Jaggaer among them.

CompetitorWhere it competes
Everstream AnalyticsPredictive risk analytics for automotive, chemicals, energy and food
ResilincMulti-tier mapping and resiliency scoring; aerospace and healthcare
PrewaveSupplier risk monitoring; also a named partner inside other procurement platforms
AvettaCompliance and contractor vetting workflows
AssentCompliance and contractor vetting workflows
SpheraEnvironmental, health and safety risk
Interos competitors: Everstream Analytics for predictive risk analytics, Resilinc for multi-tier mapping and resiliency scoring, Prewave for supplier risk monitoring, Avetta and Assent for contractor and compliance-led vetting, and Sphera for environmental health safety and sustainability risk

Avetta and Assent approach the same suppliers through compliance and contractor vetting workflows. Sphera addresses environmental, health and safety risk, a different job that buyers sometimes shortlist alongside the rest by mistake. Interos competes on relationship depth; the others compete on sector fit or on the workflow wrapped around the data. All of them are scored side by side in the supply chain risk management ranking.

Strengths and weaknesses

Organizations using Interos report value in managing global supplier networks, and reviews of the platform point to its visibility into supply chains beyond direct suppliers as its strongest capability. Reviews also note a real learning curve: users need training to interpret its output, and onboarding takes data-integration work before a team is running on the risk model.

Reviews on Software Advice and SoftwareReviews cover the same ground from different angles, and the pattern across both is consistent: strong intelligence on relationships nobody else surfaces, weighed against a setup that assumes a team with time to invest in it. Buyers comparing it against a traditional third-party risk tool should expect that trade.

$2.5T
Annual disruption cost

Supply chain disruptions cost businesses an estimated $2.5 trillion in lost profit a year, and separate research found 20% of global data centers face high risk during summer months, the kind of exposure Interos aims to catch before it turns catastrophic.

↑ FACT SHEETInteros pricing

Interos pricing is available on request. Pricing follows a personalized model tied to supplier count and integration needs, so cost varies between a mid-market procurement team and a defense contractor mapping its entire supply chain.

One published federal contract is the hardest number available. The Defense Logistics Agency obligated $3,949,600 for year one of task order SP470425F0055, described in the record as "INTEROS SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTIONS", against $11,848,800 for the base and all options from 14 August 2025 to a potential end of 13 August 2028. That ceiling divided by three years equals the year-one obligation exactly, so DLA is running at roughly $3.95m a year.

The prime on that order is ThunderCat Technology, a reseller, which placed it through NASA SEWP as a competitive small-business set-aside with five offers received. The figure therefore carries reseller margin on top of whatever Interos books, and Interos is the software named in the award. ThunderCat Technology is the awardee.

Interos Inc's own federal prime awards total $12,224,789.99 across 128 transactions over the company's lifetime. That understates the federal business badly, because reseller-bought deals like the DLA task order never appear with Interos as the recipient.

A fourth number gets quoted as though it were money, and isn't. Interos announced on 24 April 2025 that it had been selected for the $919 million GSA SCRIPTS blanket purchase agreement, available to defense and civilian agencies through Carahsoft to March 2035. The $919 million is a ten-year ordering ceiling shared across multiple awardees and a distributor: a cap on what agencies may buy, separate from Interos' own revenue and from any price it charges.

Frequently asked questions

Who is the CEO of Interos?

Ted Krantz is the CEO of Interos, appointed in 2024. Founder Jennifer Bisceglie moved to Executive Vice Chair of the board at the same time.

Where is Interos headquartered?

Interos is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

What is the valuation of Interos?

Interos reached a $1 billion valuation in 2024, on roughly $224 million raised to date.

What is an Interos score?

The i-Score is Interos' risk rating, assessing a supply chain against risk factors across six domains, including cyber and ESG exposure.

Is Interos legit?

Interos is a real risk-management company backed by NightDragon, Venrock and Kleiner Perkins, with government clients including the Department of Defense and NASA.

What are the alternatives to Interos?

Everstream Analytics, Resilinc and Prewave are the closest competitors on supply chain risk, with Avetta and Assent covering compliance-led supplier vetting and Sphera covering environmental and safety risk.

What is the revenue of Interos?

Third-party estimates put Interos' annual recurring revenue near $39.7 million; the company doesn't publish official figures.