Best revenue intelligence software in 2026: top 10 platforms ranked

By Jan Suski, six years working in digital. How the scoring works.

Published 10 August 2026 · Updated 22 August 2026

Revenue intelligence software takes the customer interactions a sales team already generates, the calls, emails & meetings scattered across CRM systems, and turns them into a forecast number someone will defend on an earnings call. The category grew out of two older tools that merged: conversation intelligence, which records and analyzes sales calls, and sales forecasting, which used to live in a spreadsheet nobody trusted.

This page ranks the top revenue intelligence platforms on two things: figures their vendors publish, and contract medians tracked by Vendr across real purchases. Every number here carries a link to where it came from. Where a vendor publishes two conflicting figures for the same thing, both appear.

The buyer this page is written for runs revenue operations at a company of 50 to 5,000 employees, has a CRM already, and is choosing between a $23,112 median contract and a $76,000 one without a published price list to compare them against. Nine of the ten vendors below refuse to publish a price. One publishes every tier.

Pricing in this category moved twice in the last eighteen months. Clari and Salesloft completed a merger on 3 December 2025, BoostUp renamed itself Terret, and People.ai now trades as Backstory. Two of the ten tools on this list answer to a different name than they did last year.

Medians marked ^* are anonymized buyer-reported contract values published by Vendr. Everything else is the price the vendor publishes itself.

Evaluation criteria for revenue intelligence software

Six criteria decide the shortlist, and the ranking below applies them in this order. Each one is a test a buyer can run before signing, producing a yes, a no, or a number. Vendors describe their revenue intelligence capabilities in near-identical language, so the key metrics below are the ones a vendor publishes and can be held to.

A price or contract median you can check before the demo

Either the vendor publishes per-seat pricing, or Vendr's marketplace page reports a tracked median with a purchase count behind it. Vendr's header widget and its in-page stat block disagree on deal counts for every vendor tested, so the figures used here come from the in-page block, which names the purchase count. A median backed by 1,569 purchases is evidence; a median with no count behind it isn't.

Conversation capture depth

Count the transcription languages the vendor publishes, the meeting platforms it connects to, and if recording needs a bot in the call. Gong publishes 70+ languages. Avoma publishes 70+. Clari, Salesloft, Outreach, Aviso and Terret publish no language count at all, which makes a non-English pilot an unbudgeted risk.

What feeds the forecast model, and if the accuracy claim names a method

Every vendor in this category claims its predictive analytics improve forecasting accuracy, and advertises a number for it. Almost none publishes the sample, the baseline or the measurement window behind it. Outreach claims 81% deal-outcome accuracy, Terret claims 92%+, Aviso claims 98%+. None of the three discloses how it was measured. Treat the named model inputs as the real signal & the percentage as marketing.

Native CRM coverage

Every platform ranked here integrates with Salesforce Sales Cloud. The differences start with the second CRM, so count the ones a vendor supports with a first-party integration. ZoomInfo names Salesforce, HubSpot and Microsoft Dynamics. Mediafly names six. Revenue.io names one: "Revenue.io is built exclusively for Salesforce." That single line disqualifies it for any HubSpot or Dynamics shop, whatever else it does well.

Published platform limits

API call caps, credit metering rules, storage ceilings, seat minimums and seat maximums. These are the numbers that decide if a tool survives contact with a real data volume. Outreach publishes all four by tier. Avoma publishes seat caps of 25, 100 and a 10-seat floor. Seven of the ten publish none of it.

Contract mechanics documented in public

Auto-renewal notice windows, mid-term true-ups, seat overage billing and renewal uplift. Mediafly's master services agreement puts the notice window at 30 days and bills seat overage immediately. Backstory publishes a True Forward mechanic that bills nothing retroactively. Most vendors document none of this until the redline stage, and the cancellation stories in the reviews below all trace back to that gap.

The 10 best revenue intelligence platforms, ranked

01

Gong

Back to top ↑

Best fit

revenue teams where what happened on the call is the thing the forecast has to explain.

Gong records, transcribes and scores sales interactions, then builds deal boards and a forecast on top of that record. Its own press office put annual recurring revenue past $500 million on 12 May 2026, growing over 55% year over year, with the customer base passing 5,000 organisations in March 2026.

The forecasting side runs on what Gong describes as 300+ unique signals predicting deal outcomes with 20% more precision than CRM-only algorithms. Gong splits the product into Forecast Essentials (deal boards, AI Deal Reviewer, win/loss insights) and full Forecast, which adds forecast submission, AI Deal Predictor and Forecast Analytics.

Key features

• Transcription in 70+ languages across Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex

• Gong Engage, Forecast, Enable for sales coaching, and the Revenue Graph context layer, sold as separate products

• 426 listings in the Gong Collective integration directory, covering Salesforce, HubSpot CRM and Microsoft Dynamics

• Custom retention and redaction settings, plus bring-your-own-key encryption

• ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2 and PCI DSS SAQ-D certifications

• Published 99.5% uptime, with customer data excluded from generative model training

Pricing

Gong publishes no price. Its pricing page states that licences are priced per user, that a platform fee applies based on the number of users supported, and that integrations are free. Vendr's marketplace page reports a median of $54,900 per year from 1,126 purchases, with a low of $11,352 and a high of $204,036, last updated March 2026.

Pros

• Largest published language coverage in the category, tied with Avoma

• Integration directory is an order of magnitude deeper than any competitor here

• Retention and redaction are configurable by region, role and use case

• 50% of customers now run more than one Gong product, and AI-powered insights are being used: Gong reports Assistant use growing over 200% year over year

Cons

• Platform fee sits on top of per-seat cost and neither figure is published

• The Outlook add-on doesn't log emails back to the opportunity

• Reviewers report forecast amounts drifting from the CRM figure

"There is a Gong Outlook add-on but it's only good for adding in templates. It does not log the emails coming from Outlook to Gong or the opportunity. You have to manually go into the CRM, find the opp, go through activity and manually associate the email."

Verified account manager in sales at a 201 to 500 employee company, TrustRadius, 30 June 2026.

Why it's ranked #1. Gong beats Clari on conversation capture depth, the second criterion: 70+ published transcription languages against zero published by Clari, at a $54,900 median that undercuts Clari's $76,000 by $21,100 a year.

03

Outreach

Back to top ↑

Best fit

sales operations teams that want sequences, conversation intelligence and forecasting from one vendor, and that need to know the API ceiling before they build against it.

Outreach moved its whole site from outreach.io to outreach.ai and repackaged into four tiers: Amplify Essentials, Core, Plus and Pro. It's the only vendor in this ranking that publishes hard technical limits per tier. API calls run 250,000 on Essentials and Core, 500,000 on Plus and 1,000,000 on Pro. Custom objects run 5, 5, 10 and 20. Knowledge storage runs 500MB, 500MB, 750MB and 1,500MB.

Pricing combines seats with metered AI credits: 10,000 on Essentials rising to 100,000 on Pro, with an action defined as a single AI task carrying a predictable credit cost. Overage doesn't shut anything off; you buy credit packs. Forecasting, multi-currency and territory management sit on Amplify Pro only, which is the detail that decides the tier for most RevOps buyers.

Key features

• Six named agents: Omni, Research, Deal, Revenue, Personalization and Meeting Prep

• Forecasting with AI Projection, intraquarter modelling, scenario planner and parallel forecasting

• Conversation intelligence across Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Cisco Webex

• Outreach MCP server and client included on all four tiers

• Line-item forecasting and forecast submission history on Amplify Pro

Pricing

Per-user pricing with no platform fees and support included, per the vendor's own page, but no dollar figure anywhere. Vendr reports a median of $45,540 per year from 910 purchases, with a low of $8,500 and a high of $213,986. Paid add-ons include data sharing, connectors, additional instances and listener licences.

Pros

• Only vendor here publishing API call caps, custom object counts and storage per tier

• AI credit metering is defined per action

• Buying credit packs mid-term keeps the platform running past the cap

Cons

• Forecasting is gated to the top tier

• Report customisation is set at company level, so users can't reorder their own columns

• Multiple reviewers describe auto-renewal enforcement and lost data access after termination

"Outreach terminated my account without any notice, warning, or communication whatsoever, despite the fact that my account was on automatic renewal and had been active for several years. One day I simply could not log in, and when I reached out, I was told the only way to get access back was to buy five licenses I don't need, at a much higher cost."

Robert P., founder and CEO at a company of 50 or fewer employees, 0.5 out of 5, G2, 4 September 2025.

Why it's ranked #3. Outreach beats Salesloft on criterion five with four published limits per tier against Salesloft's zero, and loses to Clari on criterion three: 81% accuracy with no method disclosed, against a 10 million opportunity training set.

07

Avoma

Back to top ↑

Best fit

mid-market teams under 25 seats that want a working price before they book a demo.

Avoma publishes every tier, which no other platform in this ranking does. Recording seats cost $19 per month on Startup, $29 on Organization and $39 on Enterprise, all billed annually, with monthly billing at $29 and $39. Only users who record pay; viewers, commenters and collaborators, customer success and finance included, are free and unlimited. Startup caps at 25 paid seats, Organization at 100, and Enterprise sets a 10-seat floor.

Revenue intelligence is an add-on at $29 per seat per month, covering AI deal risks, a sales methodology tracker, AI win-loss analysis and forecasting. Conversation intelligence is a separate $29 add-on. A ten-seat Organization team wanting both pays $87 per seat per month, or $10,440 a year, against a $54,900 Gong median. The 14-day trial runs the Organization plan with every add-on enabled and takes no card.

Key features

• Transcription in 70+ languages, matching Gong's published count

• Bot-less native recording and bot-based recording both supported

• Native CRM connections to Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho, Pipedrive and Copper

• Dialer integrations with RingCentral, Zoom, Aircall and Kixie

• Unlimited transcription minutes and unlimited recording storage on every tier

Pricing

Published, as above. Vendr's tracked median is $23,112 per year, low $12,471, high $35,154, which is what larger Avoma deployments cost once add-ons stack. Pre-recorded file uploads cap at 5, 10 and 20 per user per month by tier.

Pros

• Cheapest entry point in the category at $19 per recording seat per month

• Free unlimited viewer seats, so managers and finance cost nothing

• 14-day trial with add-ons, no credit card

• Documented migrations from Gong with transcripts and intelligence regenerated

Cons

• Integration catalogue is narrower than Gong's 426 listings

• Revenue intelligence and conversation intelligence are separate paid add-ons that triple the base seat price

• All recording users must sit on the same plan tier

• One customer reports being held to 87 seats while using 48

"We are paying for double the amount of seats that we need. We only have 48 active users and are paying for 87. We don't have the headcount that we did at the beginning of the year, which we let them know about, and they signed us up for another year with the same amount of people. We asked multiple times to revisist the contract and renegotiate the user count with them. Multiple times they flat out refused."

Jessica W., IT specialist at a 51 to 1,000 employee company, G2, 30 September 2022. A sales director at a company under 50 employees wrote in August 2024: "Avoma is a more cost effective solution than Gong. That was the main reason for our transition."

Why it's ranked #7. Avoma wins criterion one outright as the only platform with published per-seat pricing, and loses to Aviso on criterion three: forecasting is a $29 add-on with no published model inputs, against an eight-quarter time-series engine.

What revenue intelligence software does

Revenue intelligence platforms work by sitting between the communication tools a sales team uses and the CRM they're supposed to update. They capture calls, meetings, emails & calendar events automatically, match them to the right account and opportunity, then score the resulting record for risk. The output is a forecast sales leaders can inspect deal by deal instead of accepting a rep's commit.

Three jobs run underneath that. Automated activity capture removes manual data entry and keeps CRM hygiene from depending on rep discipline, which is where Backstory and Clari Capture concentrate. Conversation intelligence transcribes and analyses what was said, which is Gong's origin and Avoma's whole product. Forecasting models the outcome with predictive models trained on pipeline history, which is where Clari, Aviso and Terret started.

Most vendors now claim all three sets of revenue intelligence features. The published specs say otherwise: Backstory records nothing, Terret sources its conversation data from Gong or Chorus, and Revenue.io's entry tier has transcription switched off. Read the tier matrix.

The reporting layer is where these platforms diverge most. Revenue.io ships 140+ reports, all of them on the Orchestrate tier. Clari builds pipeline analytics around forecast submission and a week-over-week trend chart. Aviso bundles reports and analytics into the same platform as its conversation and relationship intelligence.

Data visualization decides if sales leaders open the tool weekly or once a quarter, and pipeline health is the view most of them open first, with sales trends across the quarter behind it.

Category subtypes and when each one fits

Conversation-first platforms are the right buy when coaching drives performance. Gong, Avoma and ZoomInfo's Chorus module record and analyse the call, and the forecast is built from what the recording revealed. Language coverage decides these deals: 70+ languages published by Gong and Avoma, nothing published by anyone else.

Forecast-first platforms are the right buy when the CRM already holds decent data and the problem is the number, not the conversation. Forecasting capabilities are the product here, not a module bolted on. Clari, Aviso and Terret model pipeline movement from CRM history plus whatever signals they can ingest, so they analyze data the CRM already holds and data quality issues upstream land straight in the forecast.

Aviso reads eight quarters back; Clari trained against 10 million opportunities.

Engagement-first platforms bolt intelligence onto the sequences and dialers that drive customer engagement. Outreach, Salesloft and Revenue.io fit teams whose sales process runs through the outbound workflow daily, and whose forecasting need is real but secondary. The tell is that Outreach gates forecasting to Amplify Pro and Revenue.io gates deal health scores to Orchestrate.

Where the data comes from and how collection differs

Every platform here reads the CRM, and most read the calendar and mailbox. The split appears at the recording layer. Gong, Avoma, Chorus and Revenue.io capture the call themselves. Avoma is the only one publishing that it supports both bot-based and bot-less recording, which matters where a visible meeting bot changes buyer behaviour or breaches a client's policy.

ZoomInfo adds a third source that nobody else here has: its own contact database, refreshed on a 60-day average cycle with crawlers scanning 10 million pages a day. That resolves an inbound web visitor to a person at 50 to 60% in the US, which is a different job from analysing a call, and it's why ZoomInfo appears on shortlists that started with Gong.

Backstory shows what the pure capture layer looks like on its own. It ingests from Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Exchange on-premises, Zoom, Webex, Teams, Meet, Gong & Slack, generates risk signals from conversation content and contact buying power, and records nothing. Any dialer that logs to Salesforce with task type "Call" is supported.

What revenue intelligence software costs across the category

Tracked medians run from $23,112 at Avoma to $76,000 at Clari, a 3.3x spread for products that describe themselves in nearly identical language. The full range is wider still: Backstory's tracked purchases run from $2,000 to $123,336, and Revenue.io's from $16,798 to $393,211. A published median tells you where to open, not what you'll pay.

Three cost structures operate here. Per-seat with a platform fee, which is Gong's model and the reason its quoted number surprises buyers. Seat plus metered credits, which is Outreach with its 10,000 to 100,000 AI credits per tier, and ZoomInfo where every export costs one credit including API calls made by an integration. Consumption without seat fees, which so far is only Backstory.

The hidden costs cluster in three places. Add-ons: Avoma's revenue intelligence and conversation intelligence modules cost $29 per seat each, more than the $19 Startup base seat. Integration fees: ZoomInfo's pre-packaged integrations carry a base cost plus a minimum bulk credit purchase. Tier gating: forecasting on Outreach requires Amplify Pro, and transcription on Revenue.io requires Engage.

Discounting is real and documented. Vendr records average savings of 22% on ZoomInfo, 18% on Salesloft, 15% on Backstory and 12% on Outreach. One Backstory buyer kept a 40% discount at renewal with no price increase; a Mediafly buyer turned a proposed 5% uplift into a flat 12-month renewal.

Common mistakes when buying revenue intelligence tools

Buying on a forecast accuracy percentage is the first one. Outreach says 81%, Terret says 92%+, Aviso says 98%+, and none of the three publishes the sample, the baseline or the window. Those numbers can't be compared to each other because they don't measure the same thing. Ask what the model reads instead: Salesloft names deal size, deal stages and days open, and that answer is checkable.

Skipping the contract terms is the second, and it's the one that shows up in reviews as anger. An Outreach customer lost login access and years of sequence history after an auto-renewal dispute. A Salesloft customer describes renewal terms enforced with no flexibility on users or features after a missed reminder email. An Avoma customer is paying for 87 seats while using 48.

Assuming CRM support is the third. Revenue.io requires a Salesforce licence with API access for every user. Clari's published integrations page lists Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, with Dynamics absent. Aviso maintains dedicated pages for Dynamics, SAP CRM and Siebel, and is the only vendor here that does.

Underestimating the language requirement is the fourth. Only two vendors publish a transcription language count. If the pilot includes a German or Japanese team, that's a question for the demo call, not the contract.

How to run an evaluation of revenue intelligence platforms

Start with a fixed scenario in units the vendors can all price: a seat count, a monthly call volume, a CRM, and the number of API-driven exports per month. Send the same scenario to every vendor. Because the pricing units differ (seats, credits, connected reps, consumed answers), a shared scenario is the only way the quotes become comparable.

Use the free entry points where they exist. ZoomInfo runs self-serve free trials on Professional, Copilot Advanced and Copilot Enterprise. Avoma gives 14 days on the Organization plan with every add-on enabled and no card. Terret offers a 48-hour proof of concept that returns a closed-lost analysis of last quarter with quotes from real calls. Aviso, Clari, Gong, Outreach, Salesloft, Revenue.io & Backstory offer none.

Run the pilot on one segment, a rep team working existing accounts, and test the two things demos hide. Run a non-English call through the transcriber and read the output. And ask, in writing, for the auto-renewal notice window, the seat overage policy and the renewal uplift cap before the redline stage, since those three clauses produced every cancellation story quoted on this page.

Gong versus Clari

These two are the most-compared pair in the category, and they answer different questions. Gong's record is the conversation: 70+ languages, 300+ signals feeding deal predictions, 426 integration listings. Clari's record is the pipeline: 10 million opportunities in its benchmarking set, forecast submission and roll-up built for a finance function, plus Salesloft's engagement stack after the December 2025 merger.

Cost separates them cleanly. Gong's median is $54,900 across 1,126 tracked purchases; Clari's is $76,000 across 291. Gong charges a platform fee on top of seats and gives integrations away free; Clari charges no platform fee for integrations or support. Buyers who want the calls to explain the forecast take Gong. Buyers whose CFO owns the forecast submission take Clari.

Outreach versus Salesloft

Both sell sequences plus intelligence, and buyers switch between them in both directions for the same reason: the reporting. A Salesloft user who moved to Outreach cited losing per-user report customisation, since Outreach sets columns at company level. An Outreach user who moved the other way cited the native Salesforce admin experience.

The published numbers favour Outreach on limits and Salesloft on price. Outreach names API caps of 250,000 to 1,000,000 calls, custom object counts, storage ceilings and AI credit allowances per tier. Salesloft names none of those, and comes in $14,800 cheaper at the median, $30,740 against $45,540. Forecasting is included in Salesloft's platform and gated to Outreach's top tier.

Vendor-published outcome metrics and what to measure yourself

Every vendor here publishes a table showing how its platform will improve sales performance, and every one of those tables is customer-self-reported. Salesloft footnotes its 322% more pipeline, 75% faster deals and 28% more deals won as "real success metrics reported from Salesloft customers within the first year of implementation", with no sample size. Clari's August 2023 release states that enterprises running revenue on its platform win 24% more deals.

Aviso's KPI table is the most detailed and the most instructive on where revenue growth comes from. It reports net new revenue per rep rising from $150.8k to $204.8k, win rate from 33.8% to 38.0%, average deal size from $31.8k to $36.9k, sales cycle time falling from 168.6 days to 129.5, and commit accuracy from 75.3% to 80.9%, calculated across customers with at least one year on the platform.

No sample size is given, so the numbers only describe a direction.

Measure four things yourself, starting the quarter before rollout so there's a sales performance baseline. Forecast accuracy against submitted commit, week by week. Win rate on deals that went through coaching against deals that didn't. Sales cycle length, in days from stage two to close. And hours of manual data entry removed, which is the one metric an activity capture platform should move inside a month.

Lower-cost platforms outside the top 10

Revenue Grid publishes three per-user tiers: Activity Capture 360 at $30 per user per month, Knowledge Capture at $49 and Revenue Grid Ultimate at $149. Forecasting, True Pipeline, team analytics, deal guidance and sales cadences all sit on Ultimate. The two cheaper tiers are Salesforce activity capture with an AI-powered chat and search layer over the captured data, so at $30 or $49 there's no forecast to evaluate.

Salesmotion prices a single seat at $85 per month billed monthly with no annual contract, covering 100 monitored accounts, one user, verified emails and direct dials, and round-the-clock buying-signal monitoring. Salesforce and HubSpot connectors, API access and MCP access all require a custom team plan. It watches accounts for signals, which is a different job from every platform ranked above.

Teams running HubSpot Sales Hub as their CRM have three ranked options with native HubSpot support: ZoomInfo, Salesloft and Avoma, at medians of $33,500, $30,740 and $23,112.

Market size and growth rate for revenue intelligence software

The revenue intelligence market reached $3.8 billion in 2024 and is growing at a 34.6% CAGR. Market trends inside the vendor list match that rate: seven acquisitions by Mediafly, a Clari and Salesloft merger, and two rebrands inside twelve months.

Seventy-five percent of companies plan to increase investment in revenue intelligence. Companies implementing revenue intelligence see a 15% increase in sales efficiency, and sales teams report 25% to 50% revenue increases after implementation. Those are category-level figures. They explain why the budget exists; they don't predict what one platform will do to drive revenue growth.

Consolidation in the revenue intelligence market

The vendor list changes faster than the category does. Clari acquired DealPoint in September 2021, Wingman in June 2022 and Groove in August 2023, then merged with Salesloft on 3 December 2025. Mediafly made seven acquisitions in seven years: Alinean, Presentify, InsightSquared, Aptology, ExecVision, Dooly and Appinium, and folded the InsightSquared product into a 360 product family that its own site now redirects away from.

Two of the ten platforms here renamed themselves within the last year. BoostUp became Terret, keeping app.boostup.ai as its login domain. People.ai became Backstory, keeping People.ai, Inc. as the legal entity. Both changes leave procurement records, security reviews and SSO configurations pointing at names that no longer appear on the vendor's website.

Funding tells the same story of a category still being assembled. Clari raised $225 million in January 2022, more than quadrupling its valuation in two years. Mediafly raised $80 million in August 2023 led by BIP Ventures. Aviso's last published raise on its own newsroom is $8 million, in February 2017.

Frequently asked questions

How much does revenue intelligence software cost?

Tracked contract medians run from $23,112 a year at Avoma to $76,000 at Clari. Avoma is the only ranked vendor publishing a per-seat rate, at $19 to $39 per recording seat per month billed annually. Vendr's marketplace records a $54,900 median for Gong across 1,126 purchases and $45,540 for Outreach across 910. Outside the ranking, Revenue Grid publishes $30, $49 and $149 per user per month, and Salesmotion $85 per month for one seat.

What's the difference between revenue intelligence and conversation intelligence?

Conversation intelligence records, transcribes and scores customer calls. Revenue intelligence adds automated activity capture and forecasting on top of that record, so the output is a pipeline number. Avoma prices the two separately, at $29 per seat per month each, which makes the split visible.

Do these platforms work without Salesforce?

Most do. ZoomInfo, Salesloft and Avoma name HubSpot as a native CRM alongside Salesforce, and Aviso maintains dedicated integrations for Microsoft Dynamics, SAP CRM and Siebel. Revenue.io doesn't: it requires a Salesforce licence with API access for every user.

Which revenue intelligence platforms offer a free trial?

ZoomInfo runs self-serve free trials on Professional, Copilot Advanced and Copilot Enterprise. Avoma offers 14 days on the Organization plan with all add-ons enabled and no credit card. Terret offers a 48-hour proof of concept instead of a trial. The other seven ranked platforms require a demo call.

How accurate are AI sales forecasts?

Vendor claims range from 81% at Outreach to 98%+ at Aviso, and none of them publishes the sample size, baseline or measurement window. The one historical exception is Aviso's 2018 release, which put WinScore at 92% based on hundreds of thousands of deals analysed in a single quarter. Compare the named model inputs instead of the percentages.

Bottom line

Gong takes the top spot on capture depth and integration breadth at a $54,900 median that runs $21,100 under Clari, and it's the right buy where the sales conversation is the thing the forecast has to explain. Clari earns the premium when the CFO owns the forecast submission and the Salesloft engagement stack comes with it.

Below the top two, the choice narrows by constraint. Salesforce-only shops with 15+ seats and heavy call volume should look at Revenue.io. Dynamics, SAP or Siebel shops have one real option in Aviso. Mid-market teams under 25 seats that want a number before a demo call have one real option in Avoma, at $19 per recording seat per month.

For everyone else, the deciding question is which vendor will tell you, in writing, what happens at renewal. Backstory's True Forward clause and Outreach's per-tier API caps are the two most useful things any vendor on this list publishes, and both are worth more at the negotiating table than another accuracy percentage with no method attached.